From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marchwinski v. Howard

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Jan 21, 2003
319 F.3d 258 (6th Cir. 2003)

Opinion

No. 00-2115.

January 21, 2003.

Before: MARTIN, Chief Judge; BOGGS, BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, MOORE, COLE, CLAY, GILMAN, GIBBONS, and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(a) provides as follows:

"The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal."

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

It is further ORDERED that the appellant and appellees file a supplemental brief not later than Monday, February 17, 2003.


Summaries of

Marchwinski v. Howard

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Jan 21, 2003
319 F.3d 258 (6th Cir. 2003)
Case details for

Marchwinski v. Howard

Case Details

Full title:Tanya L. MARCHWINSKI, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Douglas E. HOWARD…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Jan 21, 2003

Citations

319 F.3d 258 (6th Cir. 2003)

Citing Cases

LeBron v. Wilkins

On the record presented to this Court, it appears that the analysis failed to advise the Senate that the…

Lebron v. Sec'y, Fla. Dep't of Children & Family

4. I am not persuaded by the only other appellate decision addressing the constitutionality of a warrantless…