From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marcell v. Engebretson

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Apr 15, 1935
76 F.2d 876 (8th Cir. 1935)

Opinion

Nos. 9976, 10030.

April 15, 1935.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of South Dakota.

On rehearing.

Former opinion adhered to, and decree below reversed, with directions.

For former opinion, see 74 F.2d 93.

Clinton Brome and W.H. Herdman, both of Omaha, Neb. (U.S.G. Cherry and Gale B. Braithwaite, both of Sioux Falls, S.D., on the brief), for appellants.

M.E. Culhane, of Minneapolis, Minn., and Olaf Eidem, of Brookings, S.D. (Frank L. Weaver and William M. Giller, both of Omaha, Neb., on the brief), for appellee.

Before GARDNER, SANBORN, and VAN VALKENBURGH, Circuit Judges.


Upon petition of the appellee herein, this court granted a rehearing in case No. 10030. The case has been reargued, and we have considered the supplemental briefs and the arguments of counsel.

We have reached the conclusion that the court below was without jurisdiction, in a summary proceeding, to adjudicate title to the property in the possession of the appellants; that the opinion heretofore filed herein should stand as the opinion of this court in this case; and that the decree appealed from should be reversed, with directions to dismiss the summary proceeding.

It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Marcell v. Engebretson

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Apr 15, 1935
76 F.2d 876 (8th Cir. 1935)
Case details for

Marcell v. Engebretson

Case Details

Full title:MARCELL et al. v. ENGEBRETSON (two cases)

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Apr 15, 1935

Citations

76 F.2d 876 (8th Cir. 1935)

Citing Cases

United States Nat. Bank of Omaha v. Pamp

It is contended that the decree of foreclosure in the state court has removed the property from the…