From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Many v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 29, 2000
756 So. 2d 169 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Summary

refusing to review alleged jury instruction error where defendant raised question during preliminary, informal discussion but failed to object during formal charge conference or before jury retired to deliberate

Summary of this case from Wilson v. State

Opinion

No. 4D99-0216.

Opinion filed March 29, 2000.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Harold J. Cohen, Judge; L.T. No. 98-1758CFA02.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Joseph R. Chloupek, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Sarah B. Mayer, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Jean Junior Many appeals his conviction for attempted first degree murder and robbery with a firearm after trial by a jury which found him guilty as charged. He was sentenced to concurrent life sentences.

Many alleges that the trial court erred by failing to instruct the jury on attempted manslaughter as a lesser-included offense to attempted first degree murder. The record reveals that the question of an attempted manslaughter instruction was raised by defense counsel during a preliminary, informal discussion of jury instructions. Subsequently, a formal jury charge conference occurred. Defense counsel did not request an attempted manslaughter instruction at the charge conference. The trial court instructed the jury on the lesser included offenses of attempted second degree with a firearm and aggravated battery with a firearm. No instruction on attempted manslaughter was requested and none was given. When asked by the trial court whether there were any objections to the instructions as read, defense counsel answered "No." The alleged error was not preserved. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.390(d); Manka v. State, 720 So.2d 1109 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).

Even had the alleged error been preserved, failure to give the attempted manslaughter instruction would have been harmless error.See State v. Abreau, 363 So.2d 1063 (Fla. 1978); Louttit v. State, 467 So.2d 756 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).

AFFIRMED.

STEVENSON and GROSS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Many v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 29, 2000
756 So. 2d 169 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

refusing to review alleged jury instruction error where defendant raised question during preliminary, informal discussion but failed to object during formal charge conference or before jury retired to deliberate

Summary of this case from Wilson v. State
Case details for

Many v. State

Case Details

Full title:JEAN MANY, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Mar 29, 2000

Citations

756 So. 2d 169 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

Wilson v. State

An alleged error may be reviewed on appeal only if it is properly preserved or amounts to fundamental error.…