From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mallers v. Commercial Loan Trust Co.

U.S.
Mar 14, 1910
216 U.S. 613 (1910)

Opinion

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS.

No. 726.

Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted February 28, 1910. Decided March 14, 1910.

Where no Federal question is raised in the state court it is too late to attempt to do so in the assignment of error in this court. Writ of error to review 237 Ill. 119, dismissed.

THE facts are stated in the opinion.

Mr. Charles B. Stafford for the plaintiff in error.

Mr. Horace G. Stone for the defendant in error.


The Commercial Loan Trust Company, a banking corporation organized under the laws of Illinois, in 1895, brought suit against John B. Mallers upon a promissory note, and judgment was entered therein by the appellate court for the first district in favor of the bank against Mallers, which judgment was affirmed by the Supreme Court.

On the case being remanded to the appellate court an execution was issued by the clerk to enforce the collection of the judgment which Mallers moved to quash, and from the judgment of that court denying that motion a writ of error was prosecuted to the Supreme Court, which affirmed the judgment of the appellate court.

The case was then brought here on writ of error, which must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Hulbert v. Chicago, 202 U.S. 275; Burt v. Smith, 203 U.S. 129; Bonner v. Gorman, 213 U.S. 86.

No Federal question was raised in the state courts, and the attempt to raise a Federal question in the assignment of errors in this court, not only came too late, but was palpably not maintainable. Chapin v. Fye, 179 U.S. 127.

Writ of error dismissed.


Summaries of

Mallers v. Commercial Loan Trust Co.

U.S.
Mar 14, 1910
216 U.S. 613 (1910)
Case details for

Mallers v. Commercial Loan Trust Co.

Case Details

Full title:MALLERS v . COMMERCIAL LOAN TRUST COMPANY

Court:U.S.

Date published: Mar 14, 1910

Citations

216 U.S. 613 (1910)

Citing Cases

W. Va. Motor Truck Ass'n v. Public Service Com'n.

Dobie on Federal Procedure, page 888. See, also, Citizens National Bank of Cincinnati v. Durr, 257 U.S. 99,…

Cleveland Pittsburgh R.R. v. Cleveland

This proposition is too well settled to need discussion. National Bank v. Kentucky, 9 Wall. 353; Re Spies,…