From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Magnificent Twelve, Inc. v. Walker

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 5, 1988
522 So. 2d 1031 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

No. 87-2689.

April 5, 1988.

An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Edward N. Moore, Judge.

Daniels Hicks and Sam Daniels, Miami, for appellant.

Gilbride, Heller Brown and Dyanne E. Feinberg; Michael Lozoff, Miami, for appellee.

Before BASKIN, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.


The record reflects that the appellant diligently moved to vacate the default and default judgment entered against it and that the complaint against the appellant wholly fails to state a cause of action. As the appellee concedes, a default judgment entered upon a complaint which wholly fails to state a cause of action must be vacated upon a diligently filed motion to vacate even without a showing of excusable neglect in failing to timely answer the complaint. See Sunshine Security Detective Agency v. Wells Fargo Armored Services Corp., 496 So.2d 246 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Fernandez-Aguiree v. Gall, 484 So.2d 1286 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). Therefore, we reverse the default and default judgment and remand the case for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Magnificent Twelve, Inc. v. Walker

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 5, 1988
522 So. 2d 1031 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

Magnificent Twelve, Inc. v. Walker

Case Details

Full title:MAGNIFICENT TWELVE, INC., APPELLANT, v. EUGENE WALKER, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Apr 5, 1988

Citations

522 So. 2d 1031 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Citing Cases

Sec. Bank v. Bellsouth Adv. Pub

. . . . [A] motion to set aside a default judgment requires no allegations or showing of excusable neglect…

Phenion Development Group, Inc. v. Love

In this case, Appellants were properly served and fully participated in the proceeding, and this is not a…