From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maffucci v. Royal Park Limited Partnership

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Mar 27, 1997
692 A.2d 813 (Conn. 1997)

Opinion

Decided March 27, 1997


The defendants' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 42 Conn. App. 563 (AC 14586), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that there was sufficient evidence in the record to create a material issue of fact as to whether the defendants had actual or constructive notice of prior trespassers?

"2. Is the rule of § 335 of the Restatement (Second) of Torts regarding the duty of care owed a trespasser applicable to an electric utility whose operations are governed by § 16-11-102(a) of the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies?

"3. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that there was sufficient evidence on the record to create a material issue of fact as to whether or not Royal Park Limited Partnership created or maintained the switch gear that caused the injury to the plaintiff?"

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15577. Brian T. Henebry and Barbara J. Sheedy, in support of the petition.

Joel M. Ellis, in opposition.


Summaries of

Maffucci v. Royal Park Limited Partnership

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Mar 27, 1997
692 A.2d 813 (Conn. 1997)
Case details for

Maffucci v. Royal Park Limited Partnership

Case Details

Full title:MAFFUCCI v. ROYAL PARK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Mar 27, 1997

Citations

692 A.2d 813 (Conn. 1997)
692 A.2d 813

Citing Cases

Maffucci v. Royal Park Ltd. Partnership

" and (3) "Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that there was sufficient evidence on the record to…

Ketcham v. Kane

" (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Maffucci v. Royal Park Limited Partnership, 243…