Lusk v. State

Full title: JESSE HARRISON LUSK, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court: FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Mar 26, 2020

291 So. 3d 1281 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. 1D18-3379

03-26-2020

Jesse Harrison LUSK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Michael Ufferman of Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Sharon S. Traxler, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Michael Ufferman of Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Sharon S. Traxler, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED . See State v. Akins , 69 So. 3d 261, 269, 271 (Fla. 2011) (concluding that an orally pronounced sentence controls when there is a discrepancy between the oral sentence and written sentence as "written sentences are usually just a record of the actual sentence required to be pronounced in open court") (quoting Ashley v. State , 850 So. 2d 1265, 1268 (Fla. 2003) ); see also Parker v. State , 276 So. 3d 108, 109 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019) (describing the correction of a written sentence to conform to the oral sentence to be "merely a ministerial act") (quoting Frost v. State , 769 So. 2d 443, 444 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) ).

Osterhaus, Kelsey, and Nordby, JJ., concur.