From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lombardo v. Warner

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 4, 2004
371 F.3d 538 (9th Cir. 2004)

Opinion

No. 02-35269.

Filed June 4, 2004.

D.C. No. CV-98-03001-MRH(JPC).

Alan R. Herson, Jacksonville, OR, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Richard D. Wasserman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Janet A. Metcalf, Office of the Attorney General, Salem, OR, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.


ORDER


Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.


Summaries of

Lombardo v. Warner

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 4, 2004
371 F.3d 538 (9th Cir. 2004)
Case details for

Lombardo v. Warner

Case Details

Full title:James LOMBARDO, Plaintiff — Appellant, v. Bruce WARNER, in his official…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jun 4, 2004

Citations

371 F.3d 538 (9th Cir. 2004)

Citing Cases

Lombardo v. Warner

Plaintiff then requested rehearing en banc, which the court granted, withdrawing the panel opinion. Lombardo…

Lombardo v. Warner

ORDER CERTIFYING QUESTION TO THE SUPREME COURT OF OREGON We took this case en banc, Lombardo v. Warner, 371…