From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lockhart v. Lebron

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
May 6, 2019
Case No. 19-cv-60326-BLOOM/Reid (S.D. Fla. May. 6, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 19-cv-60326-BLOOM/Reid

05-06-2019

RODERICK D. LOCKHART, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER LEBRON, Defendant.

Copies to: The Honorable Lisette M. Reid Counsel of Record Roderick D. Lockhart 571804510 Broward County Jail - NBB North Broward Bureau Inmate Mail/Parcels Post Office Box 407037 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33340 PRO SE


ORDER ADOPTING IN PART MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Reid (the "Report"). See ECF No. [21]. This action was previously referred to the Honorable Lisette M. Reid for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. See ECF No. [2].

On February 5, 2019, Plaintiff filed a civil rights complaint, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ("Complaint"). ECF No. [1]. On April 17, 2019, Judge Reid issued the Report and Recommendation ("Report") recommending that the Complaint be dismissed for failure to sufficiently state a constitutional claim upon which relief can be granted. ECF No. [21], at 10-11. Judge Reid has also recommended that Plaintiff be permitted to amend the Complaint to cure its deficiencies, should he choose to do so. Id. at 11. The Report advised that any objections to the Report's findings were due within fourteen days of receipt of the Report. Id. Accordingly, objections to the Report were due no later than May 1, 2019.

On April 30, 2019, in response to the Report, the Plaintiff filed another Statement of Claim, ECF No. [23] ("Statement of Claim"). In the Statement of Claim, which the Court interprets as Plaintiff's attempt to amend his initial Complaint, Plaintiff has alleged substantially the same facts as the original complaint. See generally, ECF No. [23].

The Court has, nonetheless, conducted a de novo review of Judge Reid's Report, the Statement of Claim, the record and applicable law, and is otherwise fully advised. See Williams v. McNeil, 557 F.3d 1287, 1291 (11th Cir. 2009) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)). Upon review of the record and the Report, the Court finds Judge Reid's Report to be well reasoned and correct as it relates to the recommendation that this action be dismissed. However, in light of the Statement of Claim filed on April 30, 2019, which fails to cure the original deficiencies of the Complaint, the Court disagrees that any further leave to amend is warranted in this case. As a result, the Court finds Judge Reid's Report to be correct in its analysis of the factors set forth in Graham v. M.S. Connor, et. al, 490 U.S. 386 (1989) and the determination that the Complaint should be dismissed without prejudice. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. Judge Reid's Report and Recommendation, ECF No. [21], is ADOPTED IN PART.

2 The above-styled case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

3. To the extent not otherwise disposed of, any scheduled hearings are CANCELED, all pending motions are DENIED as moot, and all deadlines are TERMINATED.

4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida this 6th day of May, 2019.

/s/ _________

BETH BLOOM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Copies to: The Honorable Lisette M. Reid Counsel of Record Roderick D. Lockhart
571804510
Broward County Jail - NBB
North Broward Bureau
Inmate Mail/Parcels
Post Office Box 407037
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33340
PRO SE


Summaries of

Lockhart v. Lebron

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
May 6, 2019
Case No. 19-cv-60326-BLOOM/Reid (S.D. Fla. May. 6, 2019)
Case details for

Lockhart v. Lebron

Case Details

Full title:RODERICK D. LOCKHART, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER LEBRON, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Date published: May 6, 2019

Citations

Case No. 19-cv-60326-BLOOM/Reid (S.D. Fla. May. 6, 2019)

Citing Cases

Lewis v. Reyes

Indeed, courts require considerably more than has been alleged here to support a claim for excessive force.…

Jones v. Ramos

Plaintiff had not yet been handcuffed when this force was used, and the officers did not have the benefit of…