From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lock v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 24, 1991
582 So. 2d 819 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 90-02990.

July 24, 1991.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County; Jay B. Rosman, Acting Circuit Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Kevin Briggs, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Peggy A. Quince, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


We affirm the sentencing of defendant as an habitual violent felony offender upon his conviction for a first-degree felony punishable by life and fulfillment of the other requisites of section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1989). We adopt the reasoning of Paige v. State, 570 So.2d 1108 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). See also Newton v. State, 581 So.2d 212 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Tucker v. State, 576 So.2d 931, 932 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991); Westbrook v. State, 574 So.2d 1187, 1188 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).

We note conflict with Gholston v. State, 16 F.L.W. D46 (Fla. 1st DCA Dec. 17, 1990), as did Newton and Tucker.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND, J., concur.


Summaries of

Lock v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 24, 1991
582 So. 2d 819 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Lock v. State

Case Details

Full title:EDDIE MACK LOCK, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jul 24, 1991

Citations

582 So. 2d 819 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

Pelham v. State

§ 794.011(3), Fla. Stat. (1989). Because life felonies are not subject to habitual offender enhancement,…

Pelham v. State

§ 794.011(3), Fla. Stat. (1989). Because life felonies are not subject to habitual offender enhancement,…