From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Local No. 666 v. Dennis

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Sep 7, 1984
453 So. 2d 1138 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

No. 84-331.

July 5, 1984. Rehearing Denied September 7, 1984.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Rosemary Barkett, J.

Richard Siwica of Kaplan, Sicking, Hessen, Sugarman, Rosenthal, Suskind, Bloom De Castro, Miami, for appellants.

No brief filed for appellees.


This appeal from a non-final order denying a motion to quash service of process is appropriately filed under Rule 9.130(a)(3)(C)(i), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.

We reverse, holding that service of process on a secretary in the office of the business manager of a labor union is insufficient to permit the court to obtain jurisdiction over the union. § 48.141, Fla. Stat. (1983). See also § 447.11, Fla. Stat. (1983). Semble: Hauser v. Schiff, 341 So.2d 531 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and HERSEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Local No. 666 v. Dennis

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Sep 7, 1984
453 So. 2d 1138 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Local No. 666 v. Dennis

Case Details

Full title:LOCAL NO. 666, CONCRETE PRODUCTS AND MATERIAL YARD WORKERS, LABORERS…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Sep 7, 1984

Citations

453 So. 2d 1138 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Citing Cases

Taito Corporation v. Ferris

See Khubani v. Mikulic, 620 So.2d 800, 801 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); Monte Campbell Crane Co., Inc. v. Hancock, 510…

Palazzola v. Angel

An employee is "interested in the action," and is therefore ineligible to be appointed to serve process.…