From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Litwin v. Allen

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County
Feb 4, 1938
168 Misc. 205 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1938)

Opinion

February 4, 1938.

Abraham N. Geller, for the plaintiff.

Schiff, Dorfman Stern, for Isidore D. Morrison.

Kobbe, Thatcher, Frederick Hoar, for the defendant George E. Roosevelt.

Breed, Abbott Morgan, for the defendants Gladys G. Terbell, etc.

Moran, Galli McGlinn, for the defendant L.E. Zacher.

Dunnington, Bartholow Miller, for the defendant Julia W. Dula, individually and as executrix, etc.

Caruthers Ewing, for the defendant John A. Hartford.

Parker, Finley Benjamin, for the defendant Frederick P. Keppel.

Kieffer Killea, for the defendant Valentine P. Snyder's estate.

John H. Ray, for the defendant Charles P. Cooper.

Debevoise, Stevenson, Plimpton Page, for the defendants J.P. Morgan and others. Root, Clark, Buckner Ballantine, for the defendant Guaranty Trust Company of New York.

Harris, Beach, Folger, Bacon Keating, for the defendant Hebe B. Harris, as executrix, etc., of Albert H. Harris.

McCanliss Early, for the defendant Eugene W. Stetson.

Frank L. Crocker and Dunnington, Bartholow Miller, for the defendant Cornelius Vanderbilt Whitney and the defendants Gertrude Vanderbilt Whitney, Cornelius Vanderbilt Whitney and Frank L. Crocker, as executors and trustees, etc., of Harry Payne Whitney, deceased.

Davis, Polk, Wardwell, Gardiner Reed, for the defendants George G. Allen and others.


This application presents an unusual situation. The defendant seeks to examine two witnesses whose testimony it is alleged can prove that the plaintiff was neither the owner of record nor the equitable owner of stock at the commencement of the action, and therefore under the law has not the legal capacity to sue. While the law is well settled that a stockholder need not be the owner of record to institute the action, he must at least be the equitable owner. The plaintiff alleges she is the owner of said stocks. The defendant states that the plaintiff is not the owner either of record or equitable, and that proof can be adduced to establish this fact and desires to obtain this proof. Ordinarily, this issue would be reserved for the trial, but in this litigation an application is pending to have stockholders whose status is unquestioned intervene in this action. Therefore, before such intervention is ruled upon it becomes necessary to determine Whether the original action is legally well founded. To determine this the capacity of the plaintiff to sue must be established. Therefore, under these circumstances, the motion is granted, and Sidney A. Fine, No. 1440 Broadway, is appointed referee. Settle order accordingly.


Summaries of

Litwin v. Allen

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County
Feb 4, 1938
168 Misc. 205 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1938)
Case details for

Litwin v. Allen

Case Details

Full title:EVA LITWIN, as a Stockholder of the GUARANTY TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK…

Court:Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County

Date published: Feb 4, 1938

Citations

168 Misc. 205 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1938)
4 N.Y.S.2d 55

Citing Cases

Knox Glass Botl. Co. v. Underwood

I. No substantial testimony or evidence was produced by appellant to entitle it to a cancellation of the…

Winkelman v. General Motors Corporation

The New York State courts have set a precedent for that procedure. They have approved the settlement of…