From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Little v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Utah
Dec 11, 1979
604 P.2d 918 (Utah 1979)

Summary

reaffirming prior order dismissing appeal because trial court's denial of motion to dismiss was not a final order

Summary of this case from Matter of Adoption of Baby K

Opinion

No. 16678.

December 11, 1979.

Appeal from the Third District Court, Salt Lake County Christine M. Durham, J.

Robert B. Hansen, Atty. Gen., Sharon Peacock, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salt Lake City, for defendants and appellants.

David E. Littlefield, Salt Lake City, for plaintiffs and respondents.


Plaintiffs brought this action against the State Division of Family Services and the individual defendants alleging negligence in connection with placement, supervision and foster care given by them. The defendants asserted the defense of sovereign immunity and moved to dismiss the action on that ground. The court denied their motion. Defendants then proceeded under Rule 54(b), U.R.C.P. to have the trial court sign an order that the ruling was a final judgment and appealed that ruling to this Court. This Court entered its order dismissing the appeal. Within the 20 days allowed for doing so, the defendants filed a petition for rehearing.

The significant part of Rule 54(b) provides that when multiple claims and/or parties are involved, ". . . the court may direct the entry of a final judgment as to one or more but fewer than all of the claims or parties . . . [when] . . there is no just reason for delay. . . ." This does not necessarily mean that there is a final judgment merely because the order so recites. In this instance, the trial court denied the defendant's motion to dismiss, thus leaving the parties in court, and there was, therefore, in fact no final judgment. The previously entered order of this Court granting the motion to dismiss the appeal is reaffirmed.

It is to be noted that a party is not left without remedy. If there are good and sufficient reasons for such an appeal before further proceedings and determination of the issues in the lawsuits, a party may petition the Supreme Court for an intermediate appeal as provided in Rule 72(b).

CROCKETT, C.J., and MAUGHAN, HALL and STEWART, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Little v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Utah
Dec 11, 1979
604 P.2d 918 (Utah 1979)

reaffirming prior order dismissing appeal because trial court's denial of motion to dismiss was not a final order

Summary of this case from Matter of Adoption of Baby K
Case details for

Little v. Mitchell

Case Details

Full title:JONATHAN LITTLE AND HANNAH LITTLE, PLAINTIFFS AND RESPONDENTS, v. ANTHONY…

Court:Supreme Court of Utah

Date published: Dec 11, 1979

Citations

604 P.2d 918 (Utah 1979)

Citing Cases

Pate v. Marathon Steel Co.

Plaintiff then asked the trial judge to act under Rule 54(b) of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure — to make a…

Planning Board v. Mortimer

A final order, in the context of a multiple-parties action, is "one that wholly dispose[s] of one or more but…