From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lings v. Urquhart

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 19, 1931
156 A. 377 (N.J. 1931)

Opinion

Decided October 19th, 1931.

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery.

Messrs. Melosh, Morten Melosh, for the appellant.

Mr. Edwin G. Adams, for the respondent.


The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis, and reported in 106 N.J. Eq. 506. For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DALY, DONGES, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Lings v. Urquhart

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 19, 1931
156 A. 377 (N.J. 1931)
Case details for

Lings v. Urquhart

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE S. LINGS, appellant, v. ETHEL L. URQUHART, individually, c.…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Oct 19, 1931

Citations

156 A. 377 (N.J. 1931)
156 A. 377

Citing Cases

White v. Risdon

of frauds. It may be serviceable to cite my collation of the pertinent decisions: Johnson v. Hubbell, 10…

Richards v. Richards

Equity will enforce such an agreement at the suit of one who has completely performed his part if the…