From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lightbourne v. Mccollum

Supreme Court of Florida
Feb 9, 2007
No. SC06-2391 (Fla. Feb. 9, 2007)

Opinion

No. SC06-2391.

February 9, 2007.


Other than petitioner Lightborne, all of the petitioners' claims are dismissed. The dismissal is without prejudice to the petitioners' filing any claim which they may have in the appropriate court for that individual petitioner. This Court has made no decision as to the validity of the claims raised and whether those claims are timely or otherwise barred. If a petitioner files a claim, the court in which the claim is filed shall treat the claim as if it had initially been filed in that court.

LEWIS, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANTERO and BELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lightbourne v. Mccollum

Supreme Court of Florida
Feb 9, 2007
No. SC06-2391 (Fla. Feb. 9, 2007)
Case details for

Lightbourne v. Mccollum

Case Details

Full title:IAN DECO LIGHTBOURNE, ET AL., Petitioner(s) v. BILL MCCOLLUM., ETC., ET…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Feb 9, 2007

Citations

No. SC06-2391 (Fla. Feb. 9, 2007)

Citing Cases

Walton v. State

Except for petitioner Lightbourne, we dismissed the claims of all the petitioners without prejudice. See…

Tompkins v. State

See id. at 328-29. This Court dismissed the claims of all of the petitioners except petitioner Lightboume…