From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lietzke v. City of Montgomery

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Oct 19, 2017
Case No. 2:17-cv-00325-JDL (D. Me. Oct. 19, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 2:17-cv-00325-JDL Case No. 2:17-cv-00326-JDL Case No. 2:17-cv-00327-JDL Case No. 2:17-cv-00329-JDL

10-19-2017

BILL LIETZKE, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MONTGOMERY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge filed his Recommended Decision with the court on August 31, 2017, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). The time within which to file objections expired on September 15, 2017, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal. The plaintiff did file a Motion Disqualify and Reassign on September 8, 2017, as well as a Motion for Entry of Default and Motion for Entry of Default Judgment on September 28, 2017, both of which were denied.

It is now ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ACCEPTED. All four of the above-captioned cases are TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 19, 2017

/s/ Jon D. Levy

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Lietzke v. City of Montgomery

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Oct 19, 2017
Case No. 2:17-cv-00325-JDL (D. Me. Oct. 19, 2017)
Case details for

Lietzke v. City of Montgomery

Case Details

Full title:BILL LIETZKE, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MONTGOMERY, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Date published: Oct 19, 2017

Citations

Case No. 2:17-cv-00325-JDL (D. Me. Oct. 19, 2017)

Citing Cases

Lietzke v. City of Montgomery

Lietzke also has filed many cases in other districts. See, e.g., Lietzke v. City of Montgomery, 2017 WL…