From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lerman v. Northeast Permanente Medical Group

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 21, 1995
212 A.D.2d 672 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

February 21, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Walsh, J.H.O.).


Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by (1) deleting therefrom the provisions in favor of the plaintiff and against the appellants Barney D. Newman, M.D., Adrienne Weiss-Harrison, M.D., and William Zarowitz, M.D., and (2) deleting therefrom the words "with interest thereon from the 30th day of September, 1989," and substituting therefor the words "with interest thereon from December 31, 1989"; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The trial court's finding that Northeast Permanente Medical Group, P.C. was liable for breach of contract is supported by the evidence. We modify the judgment, however, because the individual defendants Barney D. Newman, M.D., Adrienne Weiss-Harrison, M.D., and William Zarowitz, M.D., who were members of the corporate defendant's board of directors, cannot be held liable merely because they were board members (see, Murtha v. Yonkers Child Care Assn., 45 N.Y.2d 913, 915).

As the earliest ascertainable date that the plaintiff's cause of action existed was December 31, 1989, when the "divisible surplus" was distributed, interest must be computed from that date (see, CPLR 5001 [b]). Sullivan, J.P., Rosenblatt, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lerman v. Northeast Permanente Medical Group

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 21, 1995
212 A.D.2d 672 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Lerman v. Northeast Permanente Medical Group

Case Details

Full title:LAWRENCE LERMAN, Respondent, v. NORTHEAST PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP, P.C.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 21, 1995

Citations

212 A.D.2d 672 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
622 N.Y.S.2d 764

Citing Cases

Stanley Agency, Inc. v. Behind the Bench, Inc.

Thus, it is clear that Jackson-Jordan did not undertake to bind herself or undertake any personal contractual…

High View Fund, L.P. v. Hall

at ¶ 90. Unless a director binds herself individually, she cannot be held personally liable on the contracts…