From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lee v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 1, 1995
661 So. 2d 1300 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

No. 94-2424.

November 1, 1995.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Arthur Rothenberg, J.

Robert Alan Rosenblatt, Miami, for appellants.

Sparkman, Robb, Nelson Mason and John W. Reis and James T. Sparkman, Ft. Lauderdale, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, JORGENSON and LEVY, JJ.


The trial court held that the time for claiming PIP benefits runs from the date of the underlying tort and not the date of a demand for payment relying on Fladd v. Fortune Ins. Co., 530 So.2d 388 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). We reverse, finding the better reasoning to be that the statute of limitations commenced to run on the date of the breach of the agreement by the insurance company's failure to pay, in accordance with Levy v. Travelers Ins. Co., 580 So.2d 190 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). Therefore, the final order of dismissal is reversed and the matter is returned to the trial court for further proceedings.

We recognize and certify that this opinion conflicts with Fladd, supra.

Reversed and remanded with directions.


Summaries of

Lee v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 1, 1995
661 So. 2d 1300 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

Lee v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:KUNBOK LEE AND GISUN LEE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Nov 1, 1995

Citations

661 So. 2d 1300 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Citing Cases

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Lee

PER CURIAM. We have for review Lee v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 661 So.2d 1300 (Fla. 3d DCA…