From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lee v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 25, 2000
770 So. 2d 231 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Summary

finding that dragging the victim by her throat from one room to another during the defendant's attack upon her was sufficient to demonstrate the necessary confinement, abduction, or imprisonment required to establish any form of kidnapping, including kidnapping under the "terrorizing" provision found in section 787.01.

Summary of this case from State v. Lumarque

Opinion

No. 3D99-1909.

Opinion filed October 25, 2000. JULY TERM, A.D. 2000

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Leslie Rothenberg, Judge. LOWER TRIBUNAL NO. 96-6742

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Bruce A. Rosenthal, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Jill K. Traina, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and SHEVIN and RAMIREZ, JJ.


We reject the appellant's only claim of trial error on the holding that the evidence was sufficient to justify his conviction for kidnapping under the "terrorizing" provision of the statute, section 787.01(1)(a)3, Florida Statutes (1999). See Biggs v. State, 745 So.2d 1051 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Waddell v. State, 696 So.2d 1229 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997), review denied, 707 So.2d 1128 (Fla. 1998). Specifically, and contrary to Lee's principal contention on this point, we conclude that the fact that the victim was dragged by her throat for almost ten feet from one room to another in the course of the defendant's vicious attack upon her is sufficient to demonstrate the confinement, abduction or imprisonment required to establish any form of kidnapping. § 787.01(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1999). See Faison v. State, 399 So.2d 19, 20-21 n. 2 3 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), approved, 426 So.2d 963 (Fla. 1983); State v. Davis, 668 So.2d 323 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); cf. Simpkins v. State, 395 So.2d 625 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). Accordingly, the convictions under review are affirmed.

787.01 Kidnapping; kidnapping of child under age 13, aggravating circumstances. —

(1)(a) The term "kidnapping" means forcibly, secretly, or by threat confining, abducting, or imprisoning another person against her or his will and without lawful authority, with intent to:

1. Hold for ransom or reward or as a shield or hostage.

2. Commit or facilitate commission of any felony.

3. Inflict bodily harm upon or to terrorize the victim or another person.

4. Interfere with the performance of any governmental or political function.

As the parties agree, however, the defendant's sentence as a violent career criminal is vacated in accordance with State v. Thompson, 750 So.2d 643 (Fla. 1999) and the cause remanded for re-sentencing.

Affirmed in part, vacated and remanded in part.


Summaries of

Lee v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 25, 2000
770 So. 2d 231 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

finding that dragging the victim by her throat from one room to another during the defendant's attack upon her was sufficient to demonstrate the necessary confinement, abduction, or imprisonment required to establish any form of kidnapping, including kidnapping under the "terrorizing" provision found in section 787.01.

Summary of this case from State v. Lumarque

affirming conviction under section 787.01 3. and concluding that evidence the “victim was dragged by her throat for almost ten feet from one room to another in the course of the defendant's vicious attack upon her is sufficient to demonstrate the confinement, abduction or imprisonment required to establish any form of kidnapping”

Summary of this case from Miller v. State
Case details for

Lee v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES ARTHUR LEE, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Oct 25, 2000

Citations

770 So. 2d 231 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

State v. Lumarque

We find that there was sufficient evidence to withstand a motion to dismiss the charge of kidnapping with the…

Rueda v. State

Affirmed. See Lee v. State, 770 So.2d 231 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) Biggs v. State, 745 So.2d 1051 (Fla. 3d DCA…