From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lawyers Title Ins. Corp. v. Reitzes

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 12, 1994
631 So. 2d 1101 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 92-1638.

January 12, 1994.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Broward County; Larry Seidlin, Judge.

Steven E. Siff of McDermott, Will Emery, Miami, for appellant.

Andrew S. Berman of Young, Franklin, Berman Karpf, P.A., North Miami Beach, for appellees.


ON RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE


We note appellant's response, filed December 6, 1993, to the order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed, as contained in our November 17, 1993, opinion denying appellant's motion for rehearing. Appellant's response does not satisfy this court's inquiry. Appellant persists in maintaining that its motion for rehearing was proper and not in derogation of the proscriptions against Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.330(a) motions rearguing the merits. We clearly rejected such a notion in our November 17, 1993, opinion.

Accordingly, as a sanction for this flagrant violation of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.330(a), we impose a fine in the amount of $1250, to be paid within 30 days of this opinion. We further direct that this fine be paid one-half by Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation, and one-half by appellant's counsel, McDermott, Will Emery.

GUNTHER and FARMER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lawyers Title Ins. Corp. v. Reitzes

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 12, 1994
631 So. 2d 1101 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Lawyers Title Ins. Corp. v. Reitzes

Case Details

Full title:LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION, A VIRGINIA CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jan 12, 1994

Citations

631 So. 2d 1101 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Citing Cases

Gainesville Coca-Cola v. Young

We hope that publication of this opinion would deter the type of motion practice appellee has engaged in.…