From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lawnwood Med. Center v. Desai

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 26, 2011
54 So. 3d 1026 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

Opinion

No. 4D09-979.

January 26, 2011.

Appeal of a non-final order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Ronald J. Rothschild, Judge; L.T. Case No. 00-18394 08 CACE.

Wesley R. Parsons, Jack R. Reiter and Veronica Tejada Lacayo of Yoss, LLP, Miami, for appellant.

Robert C. Gilbert and Bruce S. Rogow of Alters Law Firm, P.A., Miami, Julie H. Littky-Rubin of Lytal, Reiter, Clark, Fountain Williams, LLP, West Palm Beach, Jamie Alan Cole of Weiss Serota Helfman Pastoriza Cole Boniske, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, and Michael J. Pucillo of Berman DeValerio, Palm Beach Gardens, for appellees.


In an inverse condemnation action, the Department of Agriculture appeals the trial court's order denying its request for costs as the prevailing party pursuant to section 57.041, Florida Statutes. This action involves the Department's destruction of backyard citrus trees of homeowners in Broward County in the Department's futile attempt to eradicate citrus canker in this state. Even though the Department was defeated in its claim that no taking occurred, and the jury awarded damages, which resulted in a net award to the class of plaintiffs of $4,000,000, when the Department argued that no damages occurred, the Department still claims it prevailed because the class sought substantially more in damages than what the jury awarded.

The history of the citrus canker eradication program is contained in Haire v. Florida Department of Agriculture, 870 So.2d 774 (Fla. 2004).

Florida Dep't of Agriculture v. Bogorff 35 So.3d 84 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010), review denied, 48 So.3d 835 (Fla. 2010).

We find the Department's arguments to be frivolous. No matter how one looks at the facts, the owners prevailed on the significant issues. The mere fact that the owners sought more in damages than the jury awarded does not mean that they did not prevail on both issues of liability and damages.

Moreover, section 57.041, Florida Statutes, applies to all civil actions except those that are governed by specific statutes containing more particular provisions concerning the taxation of costs. See Morales v. Rosenberg, 919 So.2d 476, 480 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005). Sections 73.091 and 73.092 specifically relate to condemnation proceedings, including inverse condemnation proceedings. See Volusia County v. Pickens, 435 So.2d 247, 248 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). Those statutes govern these proceedings.

Affirmed.

POLEN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lawnwood Med. Center v. Desai

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 26, 2011
54 So. 3d 1026 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)
Case details for

Lawnwood Med. Center v. Desai

Case Details

Full title:FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES, Appellant, v…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jan 26, 2011

Citations

54 So. 3d 1026 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

Citing Cases

Fla. Dep't of Agric. & Consumer Servs. v. Bogorff

The Department also moved for attorney's fees, claiming that it was the prevailing party. The trial court…

Fla. Dep't of Agric. & Consumer Servs. v. Bogorff

The Department also moved for attorney's fees, claiming that it was the prevailing party. The trial court…