Summary
denying a due process claim concerning the admission of prior crimes evidence because the Supreme Court had expressly reserved decision on the question of whether propensity evidence could ever violate due process, and thus the state court did not unreasonably apply clearly established federal law in determining that prior crimes evidence did not violate due process
Summary of this case from Erbacher v. LizarragaOpinion
No. 07–11485.
2008-10-6
Lewis E. LARSON, petitioner, v. Brian BELLEQUE, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary.
Case below, Larson v. Palmateer, 515 F.3d 1057.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.