From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Larkin v. Pirthauer

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Oct 15, 1997
700 So. 2d 182 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

Case No. 97-1557.

Opinion filed October 15, 1997.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Mark A. Speiser, Judge; L.T. Case No. 97-105 (42).

Steven Fine of Steven Fine, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Ted P. Galatis, Jr. of Andrews, Phillips Galatis, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.


The personal representative of an estate seeks review of an order disqualifying her counsel. She seeks to appeal it as a final order; however, an order disqualifying counsel does not "finally determine a right or obligation of an interested person" in a probate proceeding, as provided by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110(a)(2), which now governs appeals of probate orders. Orders disqualifying counsel, are, however, reviewable by certiorari, Hilsenroth v. Burstyn, 432 So.2d 640 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983), and we consider this appeal as a petition for certiorari.

Shortly prior to her death, the decedent disinherited her son by means of a will prepared and witnessed by attorney Steven Fine. Decedent's son, who is seeking to set aside the will on the grounds of lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence, filed a motion to disqualify Fine from acting as counsel for the personal representative, on the ground that Fine would be a witness in the will contest. The motion was grounded on Rule 4-3.7, R.Regulating Fla.Bar, which generally prohibits lawyers from being advocates at trials at which they will be witnesses on matters of substance.

Given counsel's involvement in the preparation and execution of the will, and the issues which will be involved in the will contest — testamentary capacity and undue influence — we conclude that the trial court was correct in disqualifying counsel. Although the order of disqualification does not so provide, we interpret it to disqualify counsel only from the litigation, and not from other matters pertaining to the administration of the estate.

Certiorari denied.

WARNER, KLEIN, and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Larkin v. Pirthauer

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Oct 15, 1997
700 So. 2d 182 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Larkin v. Pirthauer

Case Details

Full title:DOLORES A. LARKIN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Oct 15, 1997

Citations

700 So. 2d 182 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Citing Cases

Herschowsky v. Guard of Herschowsky

The movant must demonstrate a departure from the essential requirements of law resulting in irreparable harm.…

Graves v. Lapi

To the extent the order disqualifies counsel from acting as the plaintiffs' advocate at trial, we deny the…