From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lanson v. Kopplow

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 29, 2010
46 So. 3d 566 (Fla. 2010)

Opinion

Case No. SC10-1745.

September 29, 2010.


Because petitioner has failed to show a clear legal right to the relief requested, she is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000). Petitioner's motion to stay the appellate proceedings pending before the Third District Court of Appeal are hereby denied. Any other motions or requests for relief in this case are hereby denied.

PARIENTE, QUINCE, POLSTON, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lanson v. Kopplow

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 29, 2010
46 So. 3d 566 (Fla. 2010)
Case details for

Lanson v. Kopplow

Case Details

Full title:MERYL M. LANSON, Petitioner(s) v. RONALD C. KOPPLOW, ET AL., Respondent(s)

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Sep 29, 2010

Citations

46 So. 3d 566 (Fla. 2010)

Citing Cases

Lanson v. Reid

The sole remaining issue on appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion when it awarded the Reid…