From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lane v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Dec 21, 2022
352 So. 3d 1259 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. 1D21-3751.

12-21-2022

Michael LANE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Jessica J. Yeary , Public Defender, and Glen P. Gifford , Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Ashley Moody , Attorney General, and Jovona I. Parker , Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Jessica J. Yeary , Public Defender, and Glen P. Gifford , Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody , Attorney General, and Jovona I. Parker , Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curium.

AFFIRMED. See Scipio v. State, 928 So.2d 1138, 1150 (Fla. 2006) (holding that any Richardson violation is harmless where no reasonable probability exists that the defense was materially hindered in its trial preparation or strategy because of the discovery violation) (citing State v. Schopp, 653 So.2d 1016, 1020-21 (Fla. 1995)).

Ray, Osterhaus, and Nordby, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lane v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Dec 21, 2022
352 So. 3d 1259 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Lane v. State

Case Details

Full title:Michael LANE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Dec 21, 2022

Citations

352 So. 3d 1259 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)