From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lambert v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 2, 1994
635 So. 2d 93 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 92-2855.

March 2, 1994.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Broward County, Kathleen A. Kearney, J.

Jane D. Fishman, Plantation, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Carol Cobourn Asbury, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


We affirm appellant's convictions, but reverse two conditions of probation. We reverse the condition that appellant use no alcohol because this condition is not reasonably related to the offenses or defendant's rehabilitation. See Baker v. State, 609 So.2d 167 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Daniels v. State, 583 So.2d 423 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). We reverse the condition that defendant have no contact with children under age 10 because this condition is too broad. It must be more specific so that the defendant cannot be charged with an unintentional violation of it. See Dean v. State, 629 So.2d 1106 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).

WARNER, KLEIN and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lambert v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 2, 1994
635 So. 2d 93 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Lambert v. State

Case Details

Full title:BONNIE LAMBERT, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Mar 2, 1994

Citations

635 So. 2d 93 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Citing Cases

Rowles v. State

The wording of this condition may subject Rowles to unintentional violation should he subsequently be…

Oliver v. State

We strike that language in special condition 15 which explicitly prohibits appellant's contact with minor…