From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lambert v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 9, 1999
730 So. 2d 397 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 97-04376

Opinion filed April 9, 1999.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Raymond O. Gross, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow and Carol J.Y. Wilson, Assistant Public Defender, Clearwater, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee and Timothy A. Freeland, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


Appellant, convicted of battery on a law enforcement officer, challenges his conviction. Because we conclude that the court erred in refusing to instruct the jury on the necessarily lesser included offense of battery, we reverse.

In State v. Wimberly, 498 So.2d 929 (Fla. 1986), the Florida Supreme Court held that "[t]he trial judge has no discretion in whether to instruct the jury on a necessarily lesser included offense. Once the judge determines that the offense is a necessarily lesser included offense, an instruction must be given." Id. at 932. Although the State maintains that any error here was harmless because appellant did not deny committing the offense, the Wimberly court concluded that even in the absence of supporting evidence for the battery instruction, it was per se reversible error to refuse to give it.

Accordingly, we reverse appellant's conviction and remand for a new trial.

THREADGILL and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Lambert v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 9, 1999
730 So. 2d 397 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Lambert v. State

Case Details

Full title:DAVID MARK LAMBERT, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Apr 9, 1999

Citations

730 So. 2d 397 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)