From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Laisure v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Sep 24, 1975
320 So. 2d 37 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

Opinion

No. 75-249.

September 24, 1975.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Lee County, Thomas W. Shands, J.

James A. Gardner, Public Defender, and Harold H. Moore, Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert J. Landry, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


We have carefully considered the record on appeal and the briefs of counsel and find that appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error.

Although not raised on appeal, the written sentence order incorrectly imposed a general sentence on both offenses charged in a two-count information. We have held such general sentences to be invalid. Darden v. State, Fla.App.2d 1975, 306 So.2d 581; Haddon v. State, Fla.App.2d 1975, 307 So.2d 238; Long v. State, Fla.App.2d 1975, 310 So.2d 35; Farmer v. State, Fla.App.2d 1975, 315 So.2d 225.

At the sentencing proceedings the trial judge stated he could not sentence appellant on both counts, and actually sentenced him on Count I only.

The cause is remanded to the trial court for the purpose of entering a corrective sentence for sale of a controlled substance in violation of § 893.13 F.S. (1973). Since this was the actual intention of the trial judge, this action may be taken without the appellant appearing before the court.

The judgment is affirmed and the cause is remanded with directions.

BOARDMAN, J., and SCHWARTZ, ALAN R., Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Laisure v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Sep 24, 1975
320 So. 2d 37 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)
Case details for

Laisure v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES LAISURE, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Sep 24, 1975

Citations

320 So. 2d 37 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

Citing Cases

Dorfman v. State

The ruling in Carter was similar in reasoning to that of the Second District in Neville v. State, 322 So.2d…