From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lafaelle v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle
Mar 25, 2010
C09-0496-JCC (W.D. Wash. Mar. 25, 2010)

Summary

upholding ALJ's RFC assessment even though it did not explicitly discuss all impairments plaintiff alleged, because the ALJ discounted several medical opinions offered by plaintiff's physicians, the ALJ's decision "reflect[ed] [the ALJ's] thorough consideration of the medical evidence," and where the RFC "specifically accounted for many of plaintiff's concerns"

Summary of this case from McCauley v. Commissioner of Social Security

Opinion

C09-0496-JCC.

March 25, 2010


ORDER


This matter comes before the Court on the report and recommendation of the Honorable Mary Alice Theiler, United States magistrate judge. (Dkt. No. 28). Having reviewed the relevant record, the Court hereby ADOPTS the report and recommendation, and thereby AFFIRMS the decision of the Commissioner.

The Clerk shall send copies of this order to counsel and to Magistrate Judge Theiler.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lafaelle v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle
Mar 25, 2010
C09-0496-JCC (W.D. Wash. Mar. 25, 2010)

upholding ALJ's RFC assessment even though it did not explicitly discuss all impairments plaintiff alleged, because the ALJ discounted several medical opinions offered by plaintiff's physicians, the ALJ's decision "reflect[ed] [the ALJ's] thorough consideration of the medical evidence," and where the RFC "specifically accounted for many of plaintiff's concerns"

Summary of this case from McCauley v. Commissioner of Social Security

upholding ALJ's RFC assessment even though it did not explicitly discuss all impairments plaintiff alleged, because the ALJ discounted several medical opinions offered by plaintiff's physicians, the ALJ's decision "reflect[ed] [the ALJ's] thorough consideration of the medical evidence," and where the RFC "specifically accounted for many of plaintiff's concerns"

Summary of this case from Barrow v. Astrue

upholding ALJ's RFC assessment even though it did not explicitly discuss all impairments plaintiff alleged, because the ALJ discounted several medical opinions offered by plaintiff's physicians, the ALJ's decision "reflect[ed] [the ALJ's] thorough consideration of the medical evidence," and where the RFC "specifically accounted for many of plaintiff's concerns"

Summary of this case from Barrow v. Astrue

upholding ALJ's RFC assessment even though it did not explicitly discuss all impairments plaintiff alleged, because the ALJ discounted several medical opinions offered by plaintiff's physicians, the ALJ's decision "reflect[ed] [the ALJ's] thorough consideration of the medical evidence," and where the RFC "specifically accounted for many of plaintiff's concerns"

Summary of this case from Hayee v. Astrue

upholding ALJ's RFC assessment even though it did not explicitly discuss all impairments plaintiff alleged, because the ALJ discounted several medical opinions offered by plaintiff's physicians, the ALJ's decision "reflect[ed] [the ALJ's] thorough consideration of the medical evidence," and where the RFC "specifically accounted for many of plaintiff's concerns"

Summary of this case from Hayee v. Astrue
Case details for

Lafaelle v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:LOSA M. LAFAELLE, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle

Date published: Mar 25, 2010

Citations

C09-0496-JCC (W.D. Wash. Mar. 25, 2010)

Citing Cases

McCauley v. Commissioner of Social Security

See Carmickle v. Comm'r, Soc. Sec. Admin., 533 F.3d 1155, 1164 (9th Cir. 2008). Given the ALJ's consideration…

Hayee v. Astrue

(AR 79-80 (plaintiff initially testified that she lost control of her bladder "every day," then later…