From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lacroix v. U.S. Dist. Court for the W. Dist. of Ky.

Supreme Court of the United States
Jan 25, 2016
577 U.S. 1117 (2016)

Opinion

No. 15–7199.

01-25-2016

Lori Rappaport LaCROIX, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY, et al.


Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for a writ of certiorari dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (per curiam ).


Summaries of

Lacroix v. U.S. Dist. Court for the W. Dist. of Ky.

Supreme Court of the United States
Jan 25, 2016
577 U.S. 1117 (2016)
Case details for

Lacroix v. U.S. Dist. Court for the W. Dist. of Ky.

Case Details

Full title:Lori Rappaport LaCROIX, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR…

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Jan 25, 2016

Citations

577 U.S. 1117 (2016)
136 S. Ct. 996
194 L. Ed. 2d 2

Citing Cases

Zanaty v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

A complaint that contains shotgun characteristics make it "'virtually impossible to know which allegations of…

Zalloum v. River Oaks Cmty. Servs. Ass'n, Inc. (In re Zalloum)

While leave to amend ordinarily should be freely given, a district court need not grant even a pro se…