From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kurach v. Truck Ins. Exch.

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
May 29, 2019
211 A.3d 1252 (Pa. 2019)

Opinion

No. 531 EAL 2018 No. 532 EAL 2018

05-29-2019

Konrad KURACH, Petitioner v. TRUCK INSURANCE EXCHANGE, Respondent Mark Wintersteen, Individually and on Behalf of All others Similarly Situated v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Respondent


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of May, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Did the Superior Court err as a matter of law in finding that the limitation of payment of General Contractors Overhead and Profit from actual cash value in a replacement cost policy, although violative of binding precedent, was nonetheless valid and enforceable?


Summaries of

Kurach v. Truck Ins. Exch.

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
May 29, 2019
211 A.3d 1252 (Pa. 2019)
Case details for

Kurach v. Truck Ins. Exch.

Case Details

Full title:KONRAD KURACH, Petitioner v. TRUCK INSURANCE EXCHANGE, Respondent MARK…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

Date published: May 29, 2019

Citations

211 A.3d 1252 (Pa. 2019)

Citing Cases

Kurach v. Truck Ins. Exch.

Did the Superior Court err as a matter of law in finding that the limitation of payment of General…

Kurach v. Truck Ins. Exch.

Did the Superior Court err as a matter of law in finding that the limitation of payment of General…