From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Krivitsky v. Gerlach

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 6, 1935
163 So. 134 (Fla. 1935)

Opinion

Appeal Dismissed Without Opinion July 5, 1935. Petition for Rehearing Denied September 6, 1935.

Present order pursuant to application for reconsideration of the petition for rehearing entered September 14, 1935.

A writ of error to the Circuit Court for Polk County, H. C. Petteway, Judge.

Anna A. Krivitsky, and J. Tom Watson, for Plaintiff in Error;

Burton G. Henson, for Defendant in Error.


The motion to quash the writ of error in this case was granted because the judgment entered in the court below was not such a judgment as will support a writ of error in that it was not a final judgment. The effect of the judgment was merely to dissolve a writ of garnishment, and there was no final judgment "that the plaintiff take nothing by her said writ of garnishment."

It is considered that the order quashing the writ of error heretofore entered in this Court shall be without prejudice to the plaintiff in error procuring the entry of a final judgment in this regard in the court below and prosecuting writ of error for review of such judgment in this Court should she be so advised.

It is so ordered.

WHITFIELD, C. J., and TERRELL, BROWN, BUFORD and DAVIS, J. J., concur.


Summaries of

Krivitsky v. Gerlach

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 6, 1935
163 So. 134 (Fla. 1935)
Case details for

Krivitsky v. Gerlach

Case Details

Full title:ANNA A. KRIVITSKY v. RUTH W. GERLACH

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Sep 6, 1935

Citations

163 So. 134 (Fla. 1935)
163 So. 134

Citing Cases

Slatcoff v. Dezen

We have repeatedly held that such a writ will not issue from this court if the order sought to be quashed is…