holding that "the sufficiency of the explanation is not to be judged in a vacuum but under the terms of the plan"
Summary of this case from Brogan v. HollandNo. 89-336.
October 16, 1989.
C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 875 F. 2d 404.
holding that "the sufficiency of the explanation is not to be judged in a vacuum but under the terms of the plan"
Summary of this case from Brogan v. Hollandrejecting claim under Section 12(b) for wrongful distribution fees as an improper attempt to circumvent the specific procedural limitations of Section 36(b)
Summary of this case from Green v. Fund Asset Management, L.P.sustaining implied right of action under Section 20
Summary of this case from Langner v. BrownFull title:KRINSK v. FUND ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 16, 1989
We have held that claims arising under section 36(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, 15 U.S.C. §…
Green v. Fund Asset Management, L.P.These cases all recognize, however, that preemption is proper where the state law conflicts with or impairs…