From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kirk v. Reynolds

Supreme Court of California
Jan 1, 1859
12 Cal. 99 (Cal. 1859)

Opinion

         Appeal from the Eleventh District, County of El Dorado.

         COUNSEL:

         John Hume, for Appellants.

          Sanderson & Newell, for Respondents.


         JUDGES: Terry, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court. Baldwin, J., and Field, J., concurring.

         OPINION

          TERRY, Judge

         This is a proceeding in the nature of a bill of review, the object of which is to procure an examination and reversal of the decree of the Court below in case of Raun v. Reynolds and Kirk, 11 Cal. 14, on the ground of error apparent in the record.

         The plaintiff appealed from the decree in the original case, and the same questions raised by this record were presented in this Court on the appeal. As a party cannot be permitted to prosecute two separate and distinct remedies in this Court for a review of the same question at the same time, the appeal is dismissed.


Summaries of

Kirk v. Reynolds

Supreme Court of California
Jan 1, 1859
12 Cal. 99 (Cal. 1859)
Case details for

Kirk v. Reynolds

Case Details

Full title:KIRK v. REYNOLDS et al., AND REYNOLDS v. HARRIS

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Jan 1, 1859

Citations

12 Cal. 99 (Cal. 1859)

Citing Cases

Waugenheim v. Graham

First --The dismissal of the appeal from the judgment for want of prosecution operates as an affirmance of…

Loftus v. Fischer

         Appellant's interest was such as entitled him to intervene. ( Code Civ. Proc., sec. 387; Horn v.…