From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Nov 9, 1979
262 S.E.2d 561 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979)

Opinion

58739.

SUBMITTED OCTOBER 18, 1979.

DECIDED NOVEMBER 9, 1979.

Aggravated assault, etc. Clarke Superior Court. Before Judge Barrow.

J. H. Affleck, Jr., for appellant.

Harry N. Gordon, District Attorney, B. Thomas Cook, Jr., Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.


The defendant appeals from his conviction for aggravated assault and asserts the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law. Held:

Despite the recent case of Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560) (1979) our scope of review is restricted to the sufficiency of the evidence as opposed to its weight and we adhere to such standard in reviewing the general grounds. Applying the constitutional standard enumerated in Jackson, supra, we find that a rational trier of fact could reasonably have found from the evidence adduced at trial proof of guilt of the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt.

Judgment affirmed. Smith and Birdsong, JJ., concur.


SUBMITTED OCTOBER 18, 1979 — DECIDED NOVEMBER 9, 1979.


Summaries of

King v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Nov 9, 1979
262 S.E.2d 561 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979)
Case details for

King v. State

Case Details

Full title:KING v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Nov 9, 1979

Citations

262 S.E.2d 561 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979)
152 Ga. App. 270

Citing Cases

Peacock v. State

This enumeration of error is without merit. See also King v. State, 152 Ga. App. 270 ( 262 S.E.2d 561)…

Taylor v. State

This evidence was sufficient for a rational jury to convict Taylor of theft by extortion. See Neal v. State,…