From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kimpton v. State

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Jan 11, 2017
895 N.W.2d 922 (Iowa Ct. App. 2017)

Summary

finding mandatory-minimum aspect of twenty-two-year-old's sentence was not cruel and unusual punishment under Lyle

Summary of this case from Mozie v. State

Opinion

No. 15-2061

01-11-2017

Tyler A. KIMPTON, Applicant-Appellant, v. STATE of Iowa, Respondent-Appellee.

Jack E. Dusthimer, Davenport, for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Louis S. Sloven, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee State.


DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Kimpton v. State

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Jan 11, 2017
895 N.W.2d 922 (Iowa Ct. App. 2017)

finding mandatory-minimum aspect of twenty-two-year-old's sentence was not cruel and unusual punishment under Lyle

Summary of this case from Mozie v. State
Case details for

Kimpton v. State

Case Details

Full title:Tyler A. KIMPTON, Applicant-Appellant, v. STATE of Iowa…

Court:Court of Appeals of Iowa.

Date published: Jan 11, 2017

Citations

895 N.W.2d 922 (Iowa Ct. App. 2017)

Citing Cases

Smith v. State

In addition, this court has rejected the same argument on several occasions. See, e.g., Thomas v. State, No.…

Mozie v. State

But, our court has not strayed from Lyle even in cases with reasoning similar to that in House. SeeMcClain ,…