From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kiddy v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 16, 1980
378 So. 2d 1332 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

Opinion

No. 78-1207.

January 16, 1980.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Broward County, Stanton S. Kaplan, J.

Robert Augustus Harper, Jr., Gainesville, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Joy B. Shearer, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


The appellant was convicted of possession of cannabis in excess of one hundred pounds. Initially, appellant contends that the information filed against him was defective and that the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss. We believe the information, which cited the specific section of the statutes involved, was sufficient under our holding in Bass v. State, 263 So.2d 611 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972).

Appellant also contends that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence substantial quantities of cannabis which, according to appellant, were seized as a result of an illegal roadblock stop and two subsequent illegal searches. However, our review of the record reflects an adequate evidentiary basis for the trial court's finding that the initial search of appellant's vehicle was conducted with his consent. See St. John v. State, 363 So.2d 862 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). In addition, although appellant complains of a second search of certain sealed boxes found to contain cannabis, the trial record contains evidence indicating that numerous bales of cannabis in an amount sufficient to sustain appellant's conviction were also found in appellant's vehicle. We also note that the trial transcript fails to demonstrate that the appellant renewed his objections to the evidence at trial after his earlier motions to suppress were denied. For that reason, appellant has failed to preserve such objections for appellate purposes. Jones v. State, 360 So.2d 1293 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).

We have reviewed the other points raised by appellant and find no merit therein. Accordingly, the judgment and sentence are hereby affirmed.

ANSTEAD and LETTS, JJ., and POWELL, ROM, Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Kiddy v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 16, 1980
378 So. 2d 1332 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)
Case details for

Kiddy v. State

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL ERVIN KIDDY, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jan 16, 1980

Citations

378 So. 2d 1332 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

Citing Cases

Weisz v. State

Defendant did not object to the absence of a warrant at trial and cannot now raise this point. Kiddy v.…

Rodriguez v. State

The state, however, is correct in pointing out that Rodriguez was required to renew pretrial objections to…