From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Khdeer v. Paul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jan 2, 2019
File No. 18-cv-02112 (ECT/BRT) (D. Minn. Jan. 2, 2019)

Opinion

File No. 18-cv-02112 (ECT/BRT)

01-02-2019

Mazen Khdeer, Petitioner, v. Warden David Paul, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court has received the November 29, 2018 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson. ECF No. 18. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 18] is ACCEPTED;

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [ECF No. 1] is DISMISSED for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, or alternatively, is DENIED on the merits; and

3. The action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: January 2, 2019

s/ Eric C. Tostrud

Eric C. Tostrud

United States District Court


Summaries of

Khdeer v. Paul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jan 2, 2019
File No. 18-cv-02112 (ECT/BRT) (D. Minn. Jan. 2, 2019)
Case details for

Khdeer v. Paul

Case Details

Full title:Mazen Khdeer, Petitioner, v. Warden David Paul, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Jan 2, 2019

Citations

File No. 18-cv-02112 (ECT/BRT) (D. Minn. Jan. 2, 2019)

Citing Cases

Washington v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons

Although 5 U.S.C. § 701(a) and 18 U.S.C. § 3621 generally preclude judicial review of BOP discretionary…