From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kendrick v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Feb 27, 1958
252 F.2d 860 (D.C. Cir. 1958)

Opinion

No. 14149.

Argued February 3, 1958.

Decided February 27, 1958.

Mr. John L. Laskey, Washington, D.C. (appointed by the District Court) for appellant.

Mr. John W. Kern, III, Asst. U.S. Atty., with whom Messrs. Oliver Gasch, U.S. Atty., Lewis Carroll, and Harold D. Rhynedance, Jr., Asst. U.S. Attys., were on the brief, for appellee. Mr. E. Tillman Stirling, Asst. U.S. Atty., also entered an appearance for appellee.

Before PRETTYMAN, WASHINGTON and BURGER, Circuit Judges.


In 1956 appellant was convicted and sentenced for assault with a deadly weapon. The conviction was affirmed on direct appeal, Kendrick v. United States, 99 U.S.App.D.C. 173, 238 F.2d 34 (1956). On motion to vacate sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, filed a year after the sentence, appellant raises for the first time the claim that he was denied the right to accompany the jury to view the premises where the crime took place. The District Court denied the motion after a hearing.

Whatever may be the nature of the right of an accused to be personally present during a view, the record discloses that appellant's absence from the view was the decision of his retained counsel, as a matter of trial strategy, and that appellant made no effort at the trial or on the direct appeal to raise the point. Under the circumstances, we think that appellant was not entitled to relief under Section 2255. See Adams v. United States, 95 U.S.App.D.C. 354, 222 F.2d 45 (1955); Martin v. United States, 101 U.S.App.D.C. 412, 248 F.2d 651 (1957); Moore v. United States, 101 U.S.App.D.C. 412, 249 F.2d 504 (1957).

See Fed.R.Crim.P. 43, 18 U.S.C. which states "The defendant shall be present * * * at every stage of the trial * * *." But cf. Snyder v. Massachusetts, 291 U.S. 97, 54 S.Ct. 330, 78 L.Ed. 674 (1934), decided before the Federal Rules were promulgated.

Trial counsel who was selected and engaged by appellant for his trial and prior appeal has been replaced by counsel appointed by the District Court to repreent him in the instant Section 2255 proceedings.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Kendrick v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Feb 27, 1958
252 F.2d 860 (D.C. Cir. 1958)
Case details for

Kendrick v. United States

Case Details

Full title:John Allen KENDRICK, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Feb 27, 1958

Citations

252 F.2d 860 (D.C. Cir. 1958)
102 U.S. App. D.C. 296

Citing Cases

United States v. Sparre

Therefore, we are not obliged, and we do not undertake, to pass upon the question of whether scienter is an…

Stein v. United States

United States v. Gore, D.C.Ky. 1955, 130 F. Supp. 117. See also Kendrick v. United States, 102 U.S. App.D.C.…