From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

K.E.H. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 14, 2001
802 So. 2d 395 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Summary

affirming conviction on facts that “[w]hen his mother persisted, appellant put his fist in his mother's face and said, ‘Leave me alone you f-ing bitch. I'm going to punch you in the f–––ing face’ ”

Summary of this case from H.W. v. State

Opinion

Case No. 4D01-737

Opinion filed November 14, 2001

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Okeechobee County; Shirley M. Brennan, Acting Circuit Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 2000-CJ-223, 2000-CJ-240, and 2001-CJ-005A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Tatjana Ostapoff, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Bart Schneider, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


We affirm appellant's conviction for assaulting his mother. Appellant's mother testified at trial that she attempted to wake her son one morning so that he could obtain a social security card and find employment. Appellant refused, shouted obscenities at her, knocked things off of the furniture, and slammed his bedroom door. When his mother persisted, appellant put his fist in his mother's face and said, "Leave me alone you f___ing bitch. I'm going to punch you in the f___ing face." He also threatened to throw her computer out the window. Feeling fear from her son's words and deeds, his mother called the police and had him arrested.

The evidence satisfies the elements of section 784.011(1), Florida Statutes (2000). Even if the threats were conditioned on the mother leaving appellant alone, that fact would not preclude an assault as a matter of law. See Blanton v. State, 388 So.2d 1271, 1273 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980).

We reverse the order reinstating appellant's probation, since the trial court had unequivocally terminated it three weeks before the assault. See Marcinek v. State, 662 So.2d 771, 772 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). There was no extrinsic fraud sufficient to set aside the final order of termination. See Driscoll v. State, 538 So.2d 1283, 1285-86 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).

GUNTHER, WARNER and GROSS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

K.E.H. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 14, 2001
802 So. 2d 395 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

affirming conviction on facts that “[w]hen his mother persisted, appellant put his fist in his mother's face and said, ‘Leave me alone you f-ing bitch. I'm going to punch you in the f–––ing face’ ”

Summary of this case from H.W. v. State
Case details for

K.E.H. v. State

Case Details

Full title:K.E.H., a child, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Nov 14, 2001

Citations

802 So. 2d 395 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Citing Cases

M.W. v. State

But a conditional threat would not preclude a finding that M.W. had committed an assault. See State v. Smith,…

M.L. v. J.H.P

Accordingly, the trial court's rulings should be affirmed. See generally §§ 784.011(1), 784.03(1)(a)1., Fla.…