From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kartchner v. State Tax Commission

Supreme Court of Utah
Mar 19, 1956
4 Utah 2 (Utah 1956)

Summary

In Kartchner v. State Tax Commission, 4 Utah 2d 382, 294 P.2d 790 (1956), we held that a judgment lien was subordinate and inferior to a deed which predated it, even though the deed may have been recorded after the judgment was docketed or may not have been recorded at all.

Summary of this case from Garland v. Fleischmann

Opinion

No. 8398.

March 19, 1956.

Appeal from the Third District Court, Salt Lake County, Joseph G. Jeppson, J.

David H. Bybee, Salt Lake City, for appellant.

Barclay Barclay, Llewellyn O. Thomas, Salt Lake City, for respondents.


Appeal from the dismissal of a quiet title action where the trial court held that one Bennett, judgment creditor of appellant Kartchner's grantor, one Wyatt, had a lien superior to the title of Kartchner, whose deed predated the judgment, but which was recorded thereafter. Reversed with costs to appellant.

This situation has received different treatment by courts under varying recording acts. Most courts which have construed statutes similar to ours have held, as we do here, that the judgment lien was subordinate and inferior to a deed which predated it, whether recorded after such judgment or whether not recorded at all. One of the most recent pronouncements to that effect is a case from our sister state of Idaho, which we cite with approval.

Title 78-22-1, Utah Code Annotated 1953. "Lien of Judgment. — From the time the judgment is docketed it becomes a lien upon all the real property of the judgment debtor * * *."
Title 57-3-3, Utah Code Annotated 1953. "Effect of failure to record. — Every conveyance of real estate hereafter made, which shall not be recorded as provided in this title, shall be void as against any subsequent purchaser in good faith and for a valuable consideration * *."

Johnson v. Casper, 1954, 75 Idaho 256, 270 P.2d 1012.

We believe that had our legislature intended a rule otherwise, it would have provided, rather than giving the judgment creditor a lien on all the real property of the judgment debtor, that such judgment creditor should have a lien on all the real property recorded in the name of the judgment debtor, which would have been a simple matter, and which would have been an action taken by some of the legislatures of other states.

McDONOUGH, C.J., and CROCKETT, WADE and WORTHEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kartchner v. State Tax Commission

Supreme Court of Utah
Mar 19, 1956
4 Utah 2 (Utah 1956)

In Kartchner v. State Tax Commission, 4 Utah 2d 382, 294 P.2d 790 (1956), we held that a judgment lien was subordinate and inferior to a deed which predated it, even though the deed may have been recorded after the judgment was docketed or may not have been recorded at all.

Summary of this case from Garland v. Fleischmann

In Kartchner v. State Tax Commission, 4 Utah 2d 382, 294 P.2d 790, 791 (1956), the Utah Supreme Court held that a judgment lien is "subordinate and inferior to a deed which predate[s] it, whether recorded after such judgment or whether not recorded at all."

Summary of this case from LACH v. DESERET BANK
Case details for

Kartchner v. State Tax Commission

Case Details

Full title:JACK PORTER KARTCHNER, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, v. STATE TAX COMMISSION OF…

Court:Supreme Court of Utah

Date published: Mar 19, 1956

Citations

4 Utah 2 (Utah 1956)
294 P.2d 790

Citing Cases

LUND v. DONIHUE

The interest of Francis was at best a naked paper title, divested in the divorce action and awarded to his…

LACH v. DESERET BANK

(emphasis added). In Kartchner v. State Tax Commission, 4 Utah 2d 382, 294 P.2d 790, 791 (1956), the Utah…