From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Karla Otto, Inc. v. Rivoli Creation, S.A.S.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Dec 3, 2014
13 Civ. 0483 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 3, 2014)

Opinion

13 Civ. 0483 (JGK)

12-03-2014

Karla Otto, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Rivoli Creation, S.A.S., d/b/a Lucien Pellat-Finet, and LPF North America, Inc., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

:

This action is dismissed without prejudice because, as the parties agree, the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction.

The application by defendant Rivoli Creation, S.A.S. for Rule 11 sanctions is denied. The defendant has failed to comply with the requirements for making a Rule 11 motion, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(c)(2), and the Court declines to exercise its power to impose Rule 11 sanctions. There is no basis for Rule 11 sanctions, particularly in view of the fact that the jurisdictional defect was raised by the Court sua sponte after the motion to dismiss was briefed on other bases.

The Clerk is directed to ender judgment dismissing this case without prejudice. The Clerk is also directed to close all pending motions.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: New York, New York

December 3, 2014

/s/_________

John G. Koeltl

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Karla Otto, Inc. v. Rivoli Creation, S.A.S.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Dec 3, 2014
13 Civ. 0483 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 3, 2014)
Case details for

Karla Otto, Inc. v. Rivoli Creation, S.A.S.

Case Details

Full title:Karla Otto, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Rivoli Creation, S.A.S., d/b/a Lucien…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Dec 3, 2014

Citations

13 Civ. 0483 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 3, 2014)

Citing Cases

Seemann v. Coastal Envtl. Grp., Inc.

Thus, the Court's sua sponte dismissal of the amended TPC on procedural grounds clearly does not provide a…

In re Bridge Constr. Servs. of Fla., Inc.

First, in both opposition memoranda, Bridge “failed to comply with the requirements for making a [separate]…