From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Joseph Riedel Glass Works v. Francis W. Kurtz Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 27, 1941
287 N.Y. 636 (N.Y. 1941)

Opinion

Argued October 21, 1941

Decided November 27, 1941

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, CAREW, J.

Barnett L. Kulak for plaintiff, appellant and respondent.

Milton H. Greenwald, George H. Zator and Solomon Goldman for William O. Van Keegan, respondent and appellant.


On appeal by Van Keegan: Order affirmed, with costs. On appeal by Joseph Riedel Glass Works, Inc.: Appeal dismissed, with costs. No opinion.

Concur: LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, FINCH, RIPPEY, LEWIS, CONWAY and DESMOND, JJ.


Summaries of

Joseph Riedel Glass Works v. Francis W. Kurtz Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 27, 1941
287 N.Y. 636 (N.Y. 1941)
Case details for

Joseph Riedel Glass Works v. Francis W. Kurtz Co.

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH RIEDEL GLASS WORKS, INC., Appellant and Respondent, v. FRANCIS W…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 27, 1941

Citations

287 N.Y. 636 (N.Y. 1941)
39 N.E.2d 270

Citing Cases

Wimbledon Fin. Master Fund v. Miller

In support, Wimbledon relies primarily on Jos. Riedel Glass Works v. Francis W. Kurtz & Co., 260 A.D. 163,…

McCloskey v. Kidder Peabody Co.

Yet the actions taken after the levy served to solidify, or tended to do so, the claim of right to vacatur of…