From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 13, 1998
721 So. 2d 320 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 97-02274.

September 9, 1998. Rehearing Denied November 13, 1998.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County, R. Timothy Peters, J.

Milton A. Galbraith, Jr., of Kutchins, Bishop Galbraith, P.A., Oldsmar, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Tonja R. Vickers, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


Tina Jones appeals her conviction for driving while her license was suspended in violation of section 322.34(1)(c), Florida Statutes (1995). The conviction resulted from Jones' operation of a moped while her driver's license had been suspended for 60 months pursuant to her classification as a habitual traffic offender. The sole issue on appeal is whether a moped is a motor vehicle, the operation of which requires a driver's license under chapter 322. We conclude that it is and affirm. In reaching this conclusion, we adopt the reasoning of Soto v. State, 711 So.2d 1275 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). We agree with the statement in Soto that any reference to mopeds by this court in State v. Riley, 698 So.2d 374 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997) (holding that go-peds are motor vehicles), is dicta.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT and SALCINES, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Jones v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 13, 1998
721 So. 2d 320 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Jones v. State

Case Details

Full title:Tina JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Nov 13, 1998

Citations

721 So. 2d 320 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Citing Cases

Williams v. State

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. State v. Meister, 849 So.2d 1127 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003);Soto v. State, 711 So.2d 1275…

State v. Meister

Id. This court then held that because a moped is a "self-propelled vehicle" and is not excluded from the…