From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Schofield

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Albany Division
Mar 30, 2009
1:08-CV-7 (WLS) (M.D. Ga. Mar. 30, 2009)

Opinion

1:08-CV-7 (WLS).

March 30, 2009


ORDER


Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge Richard L. Hodge, filed February 27, 2009. (Doc. 31). It is recommended that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 14) be granted as to Plaintiff's claims under the Prison Rape Elimination Act; granted as to Plaintiff's claims concerning the investigation of his rape; granted as to Plaintiff's claims for injunctive relief; and denied as to Plaintiff's claims of needed mental health and medical treatment. Id. No objection has been filed to date.

Upon full review and consideration upon the record, the Court finds that said Report and Recommendation (Doc. 31) should be, and hereby is, ACCEPTED, ADOPTED and made the Order of this Court for reason of the findings made and reasons stated therein. Accordingly, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 14) is GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART.

To clarify, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 14) is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's claims under the Prison Rape Elimination Act; GRANTED as to Plaintiff's claims concerning the investigation of his rape; GRANTED as to Plaintiff's claims for injunctive relief; and DENIED as to Plaintiff's claims of needed mental health and medical treatment. Therefore, Defendants Schofield and Ammons are hereby ORDERED terminated from this action as defendants. SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Jones v. Schofield

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Albany Division
Mar 30, 2009
1:08-CV-7 (WLS) (M.D. Ga. Mar. 30, 2009)
Case details for

Jones v. Schofield

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS CONWAY JONES, Plaintiff, v. DERRICK SCHOFIELD, Warden, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Albany Division

Date published: Mar 30, 2009

Citations

1:08-CV-7 (WLS) (M.D. Ga. Mar. 30, 2009)

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Perry

However, “[i]n a § 1983 action, a federal court considers whether a constitutional right has been infringed,…

Wilkerson v. Bryson

However, "[f]ailure to follow a state-created grievance procedure does not rise to the level of a…