From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Gentry

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jun 29, 2018
No. 73703 (Nev. App. Jun. 29, 2018)

Opinion

No. 73703

06-29-2018

LEROY LEE JONES, Appellant, v. JO GENTRY, WARDEN, Respondent.


ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

Leroy Lee Jones appeals from an order of the district court denying a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenging the computation of time he has served, filed on November 15, 2016. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Linda Marie Bell, Judge.

This appeal has been submitted for decision without oral argument and we conclude the record, is sufficient for our review and briefing is unwarranted. NRAP 34(f)(3), (g).

Jones claimed the Nevada Department of Corrections has not been applying statutory credits to his minimum sentences in violation of NRS 209.4465(7)(b). Jones' bare claim did not entitle him to relief. See Hargrove v. State, 100 Nev. 498, 502, 686 P.2d 222, 225 (1984) (affirming the denial of an evidentiary hearing where a claim failed to allege specific factual allegations that, if true and not belied by the record, would have entitled the petitioner to relief). Since 2007, NRS 209.4465(7) has begun, "Except as otherwise provided in subsection[ ] 8," and NRS 209.4465(8)(d) has specifically excluded an offender convicted of a category B felony from applying statutory credits to his minimum sentence. 2007 Nev. Stat., ch. 525, § 5, at 3177.

Jones provided documentation indicating his controlling sentences were for category B felonies where the sentencing statute did not mention parole eligibility. See NRS 200.380(2). However, Jones did not indicate when he committed the crimes. Accordingly, he failed to state specific facts that demonstrated he was entitled to relief. Compare NRS 209.4465(7)-(8) (exempting offenders convicted of category B felonies committed after the effective date of the 2007 amendments to the statute from application of statutory credits to their minimum sentences), with Williams v. State Dep't of Corr., 133 Nev. ___, ___, 402 P.3d 1260, 1261 (2017) (holding offenders whose sentences were committed prior to the effective date of the 2007 amendments to NRS 209.4465 were entitled to application of statutory credits to their minimum sentences where the relevant sentencing statute did not mention parole eligibility). We therefore conclude the district court did not err by denying this claim, and we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

The district court based its decision on its finding that Jones committed his crimes in 2008. That finding is neither supported nor belied by the record before this court. We nevertheless affirm the district court's decision for the reasons stated above. See Wyatt v. State, 86 Nev. 294, 298, 468 P.2d 338, 341 (1970). --------

/s/_________, C.J.

Silver /s/_________, J.
Tao /s/_________, J.
Gibbons cc: Hon. Linda Marie Bell, District Judge

Leroy Lee Jones

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Jones v. Gentry

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jun 29, 2018
No. 73703 (Nev. App. Jun. 29, 2018)
Case details for

Jones v. Gentry

Case Details

Full title:LEROY LEE JONES, Appellant, v. JO GENTRY, WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Jun 29, 2018

Citations

No. 73703 (Nev. App. Jun. 29, 2018)