From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Coe

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 29, 1991
579 So. 2d 905 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 91-00742.

May 29, 1991.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

Robert Lee Jones, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Brenda S. Taylor, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for respondent.


Robert Lee Jones petitions this court for a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to enter an order returning certain personal property. See Estevez v. Gordon, 386 So.2d 43 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

Jones states that he was arrested in 1990 for burglary. At that time the police confiscated "gold coins and $100.00 in cash," but it was never alleged that this money "was involved in any crime." The items apparently remain in police custody.

The state indicates that it has no objection to the petition. Accordingly, the circuit court should exercise its inherent power to direct the return of the gold coins and other moneys to Jones. We withhold formal issuance of the writ of mandamus.

SCHOONOVER, C.J., and FRANK and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Jones v. Coe

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 29, 1991
579 So. 2d 905 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Jones v. Coe

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT LEE JONES, PETITIONER, v. HONORABLE HARRY LEE COE, III, RESPONDENT

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: May 29, 1991

Citations

579 So. 2d 905 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

Brown v. State

Moreover, we find no justification for the trial court's refusal to direct the return of the attache case and…