From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Charles

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 13, 1988
518 So. 2d 445 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Summary

In Jones, this court held that "[a] party asserting a good faith, soundly-based attempt to change an existing rule of law is not subject to attorney's fees under section 57.105."

Summary of this case from Wiggins v. Southern Management Corp.

Opinion

No. 4-86-1162.

January 13, 1988.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Broward County, W. Herbert Moriarty, J.

Stuart A. Teller of Frank Flaster, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

Robert L. Gossett of Hodges, Gossett, McDonald, Gossett Crawford, P.A., Hollywood, for appellee.


Appellants brought suit against the owner of property abutting a public sidewalk for damages for personal injuries allegedly resulting from the owner's negligence in failing to repair the sidewalk. Attorney's fees under section 57.105, Florida Statutes (1985), were allowed against the appellants after summary judgment had been granted in favor of the defendant. Appellants appeal the award of attorney's fees. The issue is whether appellants' lawsuit was frivolous. See Whitten v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, 410 So.2d 501 (Fla. 1982).

Appellee, relying on Woods v. City of Palatka, 63 So.2d 636 (Fla. 1953), Freundlich v. South Seas Operating Corporation, 398 So.2d 490 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), Cantens v. Jeff-Son, Inc., 381 So.2d 307 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), and Beattie v. City of Coral Gables, 358 So.2d 1131 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), contends that the law is settled that one on whom a municipal ordinance imposes a duty to maintain a sidewalk is not liable to a member of the public whose personal injury is caused by failure to properly maintain and repair the sidewalk. Therefore, argues appellee, appellants' complaint was legally baseless.

We agree with appellants, however, that to the extent that the law is contrary to their position, their complaint constituted a reasonable good faith effort to effect a change in the law. See Gornto v. Marks, 311 So.2d 177, 178-79 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975) (Boyer, J., dissenting). A party asserting a good faith, soundly-based attempt to change an existing rule of law is not subject to attorney's fees under section 57.105. Parkway General Hospital, Inc. v. Stern, 400 So.2d 166 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), disapproved on other grounds, Shands Teaching Hospital and Clinics, Inc. v. Smith, 497 So.2d 644 (Fla. 1986).

We reverse that provision of the order on appeal which assesses section 57.105 attorney's fees against appellants and remand for correction of the order.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

GUNTHER, J., and RIVKIND, LEONARD, Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Jones v. Charles

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 13, 1988
518 So. 2d 445 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

In Jones, this court held that "[a] party asserting a good faith, soundly-based attempt to change an existing rule of law is not subject to attorney's fees under section 57.105."

Summary of this case from Wiggins v. Southern Management Corp.
Case details for

Jones v. Charles

Case Details

Full title:DONNA JONES AND HARRY JONES, APPELLANTS, v. MARK CHARLES, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jan 13, 1988

Citations

518 So. 2d 445 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Citing Cases

Wiggins v. Southern Management Corp.

This court has recognized the validity of permitting good faith efforts to change existing law and has not…

Vasquez v. Provincial South

Carnival Leisure Indus., Ltd. v. Holzman, 660 So.2d 410, 412 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). Where a party asserts a…