From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 26, 1990
557 So. 2d 223 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 89-2813.

February 26, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Baker County, Nath C. Doughtie, J.

Willie James Johnson, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.


The denial of appellant's 3.850 motion is affirmed. Although appellant styled his motion as one seeking relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), he is not challenging the legality of the sentences imposed, but rather is contending that the sentences were imposed in violation of the laws of the state. Such an argument is cognizable under Rule 3.850 rather than Rule 3.800(a). However, as appellant's motion was filed more than two years after January 1, 1987, his motion is untimely and therefore denied.

The opinion written on appellant's direct appeal was filed on February 16, 1982. See Johnson v. State, 409 So.2d 1158 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). Under Rule 3.850, a person whose judgment and sentence became final prior to January 1, 1985, had until January 1, 1987, to file a motion in accordance with the rule. Appellant did not file his motion until June 9, 1989.

AFFIRMED.

WENTWORTH and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Johnson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 26, 1990
557 So. 2d 223 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Johnson v. State

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE JAMES JOHNSON, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Feb 26, 1990

Citations

557 So. 2d 223 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

Thomas v. State

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Johnson v. State, 536 So.2d 1009 (Fla. 1988); Johnson v. State, 557 So.2d 223 (Fla. 1st…

Massey v. State

A sentence is not illegal simply because a statute was violated. See Johnson v. State, 557 So.2d 223 (Fla.…