From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Penrod Drilling Company

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
May 18, 1973
478 F.2d 1208 (5th Cir. 1973)

Opinion

Nos. 71-2243 and 71-2245.

May 18, 1973.

John M. Smith, Longview, Tex., Mat M. Gray, III, New Orleans, La., Sam B. Hall, Jr., Marshall, Tex., Joseph W. Milner, Shreveport, La., for defendant-appellant.

Scott Baldwin, Marshall, Tex., Joseph D. Jamail, Gus Kolius, Houston, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas; William Wayne Justice, Judge.

Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and WISDOM, GEWIN, BELL, THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, DYER SIMPSON, MORGAN, CLARK, INGRAHAM and RONEY, Circuit Judges.


ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING AND PETITIONS FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion Nov. 21, 1972, 5 Cir., 1972, 469 F.2d 897)


A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the applications for rehearing en banc and a majority of the Judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc.

It is ordered that these causes shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Penrod Drilling Company

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
May 18, 1973
478 F.2d 1208 (5th Cir. 1973)
Case details for

Johnson v. Penrod Drilling Company

Case Details

Full title:SAM H. JOHNSON, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. PENROD DRILLING COMPANY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: May 18, 1973

Citations

478 F.2d 1208 (5th Cir. 1973)

Citing Cases

Canal Barge Co. v. Griffith

The petition for rehearing filed on behalf of Canal Barge Company is Denied in all respects except with…

Copeland v. Oil Transport, Inc.

I felt that the course was becoming clearer by virtue of the Fifth Circuit decisions of Dennis v. Central…